First, it was made by an advertising
agency. That is to say they are trying to sell you something, and
most important, they are getting money for doing it.
I.
The gender setup is a really good one,
and the number of distractions within the video itself – it's a hit
parade – do quite well at obscuring its founding lie.
If you still see this thing in terms of
gender, then you have, as they say, accepted the form of the
proverbial argument. Gender is the distraction – ignore it.
No, the founding lie of the Ten Minutes
video is that a person's experience of New York City is translatable
to the other 99.9% of the nation's existence, which is to say this
video presents an interesting twist on a modern cosmopolitan fantasy:
that you can be both in control of who gives you attention and how.
There is a 99% chance you do not live
in New York City. There is also a 99% chance you fantasize about who
you'd be if you did. For young women, this video does not present a
“reality” they wish to change so much as one they aspire to adapt
to. “I'm better equipped for my future as a wealthy inhabitant of
New York having seen this!” goes the invisible thinking.
“I'll be strong!”
Sure you will. Just make sure you've
got some stylish clothes, hair, and makeup.
II.
“But she wasn't wearing makeup!”
sings your hopeful inner voice. I just choked on my whiskey.
“And still she has all these options
to turn down!”
They got you, Princess.
“I don't want any of those guys!”
is the lie you whisper to yourself. Of course you don't – they're
caricatures of “poor.” You're the woman in the video – striding
confidently on your way to a rich husband who will appreciate your
“inner beauty” all the while invisibly protected by a crew of...
wait for it... men.
Maybe you misinterpreted the title of
“..a WOMAN in...” which is code for “A vagina in
conventionally attractive packaging.” Maybe you didn't rewatch it
as “...a video crew accompanying a person...” because that's
what's really going on.
Leaving aside all possible
conversations about parts I & II, there is a deeper (IMHO) and
darker (IMHO) question to all of this that has been very noticeably
(IMHO) absent, and maybe only becomes obvious in a moment of
mescaline-induced clarity: Was 'feminism' the joke or the punchline?
III.
I don't live in New York. I only know
the marketing. It's marketing says its one of highest concentrations
of 'enlightened' people. Or something. Lots of museums, right?
So where is the feminism? The kind
that's permeated flyover bookstores for the last 40 years? If after
decades of Susan Faludi, Susie Bright, and Maya Angelou book tours a
conventionally attractive woman is still unable to walk down the
streets of New York without being noticed, then what was the point of
'feminism?' Was it just to sell books??
The answer, as they say, is hidden in
the question. “Yes,” for those of you still wondering if words
have meaning or not.
And now we come full circle. An
advertising agency – an entity predicated on selling you things –
is reminding us that 'feminism still has a lot of work to do' and by
'work' they mean the purchasing of things.
Because you'll still buy it if there's
a pretty girl on the cover.
IV:
Is Taylor Swift a woman?
She is one of the most attractively
packaged millionaires in America right now, and that's only to remind
you that packaging matters.
Oh, sure, “don't judge a book by its
cover” says the person who wears clothes because they hate their
body. Next you'll want me to believe the book's cover influences how
the book feels about itself. You're insane.
What would “Ten Hours of Walking in
New York as Taylor Swift” look like? How long can it take you to
imagine it? Why bother? That work's already been done – just watch
her videos.
But the video got you because it said
“woman” which is an incredibly broad (haha!) caricature of which
51% of the population easily self-identifies. Which is why nobody
bothered to ask why Taylor Swift would get such different treatment
than a “woman” and if you're a “woman” and “not Taylor
Swift” maybe you should be asking questions about why she gets more
cultural deference than you.
The answer is obvious to me, but that's
because the question was never for me. You'll have to read that again
to grasp what I'm illuminating here. Sure, Taylor is feminine,
there's no doubt there – but if she is insulated from a “woman”
experience in the normative sense of the word, we have to ask what it
is that insulates her, and I have the answer: she's single.
Even if she got married today, she's
still 'single'. Hard to grasp unless you're a 99%'r hunkered down in
some Montana man-cave softly stroking your NFL app between hours-long
cuckold porn masturbation sessions. Even his simian brain understands
world-class pussy versus YOU. Taylor Swift may be both unattainable
AND a fantasy, but that's how she wins. A “woman” is attainable,
and they are everywhere, which is why men can treat them like shit.
I'm sorry, did you think economic theory only applied to your
checkbook? Where did you learn that, Home Ec?
V.
Life is horrifically 'unfair' in every
measure, and that makes a terrific predicate for selling fantasies
that say otherwise. I empathize – that soothing balm is, well,
soothing. I'm not claiming to be immune, here. The Ten Hours video
got me at first, too. I was all wrapped up in defending my own ego
(“I'm not those men!”) when it struck me that was the intended
outcome. Men are supposed to want to 'protect' the video's subject by
saying “I'd never treat you like that.”
“I'll respect you.”
The joke's on you, ladies: turns out
men got the feminism memo after all. “Feminism” is about making
women feel better about themselves.
Taylor Swift is not a feminist –
Taylor Swift is a capitalist, and that you can't cleave those two
things apart is not completely your fault. But you suspect it, so
secretly you loathe her success. You want to assign it to her looks,
and not to a ruthless dedication to exploiting herself and everyone
around her to the maximum. Because that would mean she did the work
and you didn't. And that would mean you're not in the running for
Queen, Princess.
The System knows this, and is prepared
to sell you personal trainers and spas and fitness and yoga equipment
the moment you're ready to [verb] your life back on track.
Just as soon as you get the kids in
college.
